By Robert Booker, Chief Strategy Officer at HITRUST
Having looked at this evolution of cybersecurity risk management from many roles and angles over the years, I can tell you that the cyber insurance market continues to experience deep transformative change, mirroring its cyber threat and attack counterparts' growth, complexity, and prevalence. What began as a narrow offering with limited scope and availability is now a critical risk management tool for many organizations across various industries.
This blog post examines this progression to reveal significant changes in cyber insurance coverage, premiums, exclusions, reporting requirements, response protocols, and actionable insights for organizations seeking optimal coverage at favorable rates.
A decade ago, cyber insurance was an emerging market marked by a lack of information and standardization, resulting in inconsistency and uncertainty. Policies were often rudimentary and viewed as an afterthought, tacked on to broader business insurance plans as optional add-ons. Coverage was narrow in scope, primarily focusing on first-party losses like data breach notification costs and some legal liabilities. Furthermore, the underwriting process was haphazard, relying heavily on self-reported data, making it difficult for insurers to quantify cyber risks due to a lack of historical claims data and inconsistent security expectations.
Cyber insurance premiums during this early era were relatively low, reflecting both the limited coverage offered and an underestimation of the severity of the risk related to a successful cyberattack. Also helping to keep premiums low were the broad exclusions and clauses that frequently left significant coverage gaps. As one example, several early-stage policies excluded acts of cyber terrorism or nation-state attacks — exemptions that remain contentious even in today's cyber insurance market. We also saw response measures delivered ad hoc, with little emphasis on structured incident response, let alone post-breach recovery. The result was a situation where policyholders lacked complete confidence that the coverage they expected would support potential losses. There was also a lack of clarity in quantifying the premiums' value in reducing risks.
As bad actors and the cyber threats they sling have grown more sophisticated, so have the scope of cyber insurance coverage and the intricate details of the policies they create. Policies can now address various cyber risks, including ransomware payments, business interruption, regulatory fines, and reputational damage.
Some insurers have even introduced industry-specific products tailored to the risks that sectors like healthcare, finance, and manufacturing face.
Unfortunately, the surge in high-profile breaches and ransomware attacks reported across many industries and corresponding losses has driven premiums upward. According to industry reports, cyber insurance premiums have increased by double-digit percentages annually in recent years.
Insurers now demand rigorous assessments of an organization's cybersecurity posture before offering coverage, often based on proprietary control expectations. As a result, an application for cyber insurance coverage and meeting with risk analysts with different perspectives and control expectations can become a significant exercise. After completing that work, the level of coverage and the details of the clauses are adjusted to meet the insurer's expectations and risk tolerance. This activity reflects a growing emphasis on proactive risk management, with nearly every insurer recognizing that poor cyber hygiene will significantly increase the likelihood of a claim. A lack of cyber maturity can lead to more events and higher payouts for these claims.
Exclusions for nation-state attacks remain common. However, legal disputes have prompted insurers to clarify these specific clauses.
To this end, some policies now explicitly cover certain types of state-sponsored cyber incidents, albeit with nuanced limitations. Additionally, exclusions regarding policyholder negligence have become more explicit, incentivizing organizations to achieve and maintain strong baseline security measures.
Insurers are increasingly mandating robust incident reporting protocols as part of the terms they define in their policies. This shift aims to reduce a cyber incident's financial and operational impact by ensuring timely breach reporting and effective response coordination. Some policies now include access to insurer-provided incident response teams, legal counsel, and public relations support, offering policyholders a more comprehensive safety net in the event of an incident.
For organizations seeking a cyber insurance policy, the path to obtaining coverage — and securing the best possible terms — requires deliberate preparation, strategic planning, and proactive actions.
After several conversations over the past several months, it is my professional view that essential attributes, frameworks, and actions must be organized and prioritized to address existing system gaps for the cyber insurance market to thrive. The following are notable areas where improvements are necessary and can lead to significant benefits and provide maximum value to all stakeholders.
The future of the cyber insurance market is in the hands of organizations ready to embrace change and innovation on both the insurer and insured sides. What was once a peripheral consideration has become a key risk management tool, offering organizational resilience. Organizations must take ownership of their cybersecurity posture to capitalize on the evolving market, guided by these insights and actionable principles.
By adopting a proactive and informed approach, organizations can secure coverage that protects against financial loss and strengthens their ability to respond to and recover from incidents. Organizations are empowered to shape a sustainable and resilient future in this complex market by aligning cybersecurity practices with insurer expectations and staying ahead of policy innovations.