If you liked this webinar, you may also be interested in:
HITRUST transforms cybersecurity in third-party risk management from a costly compliance burden into a scalable, defensible, and resilient business advantage. Organizations using the HITRUST validated assurance model report higher efficiency, lower operational costs, and dramatically improved risk posture — achieving measurable results that prove trust can be both strategic and profitable.
In our previous post, we explored what validated assurance is and how HITRUST operationalizes it. Now, let’s look at the outcomes, the tangible business impact of turning reactive vendor oversight into validated, proactive assurance.
How does HITRUST improve TPRM efficiency?
Traditional TPRM programs rely on repetitive, manual reviews that slow down procurement and exhaust risk teams. HITRUST replaces this fragmented approach with a standardized, reusable, and scalable model.
Efficiency gains include
- 3–5× higher vendor assessment throughput by standardizing methods and automating evidence reuse.
- Faster onboarding cycles, as pre-validated vendors can be approved in a fraction of the time.
- Streamlined collaboration across procurement, compliance, and security teams using consistent data and shared assurance results.
With the HITRUST validated assurance, every vendor review adds value, not administrative overhead.
How does HITRUST reduce TPRM operational costs?
Manual risk reviews consume valuable time, personnel, and budget. By eliminating redundant assessments and reusing validated certifications, organizations achieve up to 50% lower TPRM operational costs.
Key cost drivers reduced
- Labor hours spent managing questionnaires and evidence reviews.
- Redundant vendor assessments across departments.
- Inefficient coordination between buyers and vendors.
HITRUST consolidates assurance efforts into a single, defensible framework, reducing both cost and complexity while improving visibility.
How does HITRUST strengthen resilience and risk confidence?
Efficiency and cost savings are just the beginning. The true power of validated assurance lies in resilience. According to the HITRUST 2025 Trust Report, 99.41% of HITRUST-certified environments remained breach-free in 2024. That’s not a coincidence. It’s proof that verified, continuously updated controls lead to measurable protection.
Validated assurance improves resilience through
- Evidence-based security: Every certification is independently verified and quality-controlled.
- Continuous improvement: Threat-adaptive updates ensure controls evolve with emerging risks.
- Transparent results: Organizations gain clear visibility across vendor ecosystems to spot weaknesses before they become threats.
The outcome: fewer incidents, faster response times, and greater confidence across the supply chain.
How does HITRUST turn risk management into a strategic advantage?
Validated assurance doesn’t just prevent problems. It accelerates opportunity. By reducing friction between vendors and assessing organizations, HITRUST transforms third-party risk management into a business enabler.
With HITRUST validated assurance
- Vendors gain credibility through verified certifications recognized across industries.
- Organizations streamline procurement and strengthen compliance defensibility.
- Boards and regulators receive transparent, comparable, and auditable assurance data.
This shared trust ecosystem empowers organizations to move faster, innovate confidently, and demonstrate leadership in security and compliance.
What’s the bottom line?
HITRUST offers a proven model driving measurable business outcomes for cybersecurity in TPRM.
|
Business Challenges |
HITRUST Impact |
|
Vendor review bottlenecks |
3–5× faster vendor throughput |
|
Rising TPRM costs |
Up to 50% operational cost reduction |
|
Vendor risk uncertainty |
99.41% breach-free certified environments |
|
Reactive oversight |
Proactive, defensible assurance |
|
Compliance fatigue |
Streamlined, scalable trust ecosystem |
What was once a reactive process of vendor oversight has become a strategic pillar of resilience and growth, all made possible through HITRUST’s validated assurance ecosystem.
Learn more in our white paper
Explore how validated assurance delivers measurable efficiency, risk reduction, and resilience in our new white paper: Redefining Third-Party Risk Management with the HITRUST Validated Assurance
Discover how HITRUST empowers organizations to redefine vendor oversight, turning compliance burdens into breakthrough business results.
Transforming Vendor Risk Management: The Business Impact of HITRUST Assurance Transforming Vendor Risk Management: The Business Impact of HITRUST Assurance
Validated assurance is the new standard for third-party trust, providing verified, benchmarked, and quality-controlled proof of security that replaces manual, self-attested processes. It enables organizations to assess, monitor, and trust vendors with confidence, reducing complexity while increasing transparency across the entire third-party ecosystem.
In our previous post, we explored why traditional third-party risk management (TPRM) models are breaking down, burdened by inefficiency, inconsistency, and incomplete assurance. Now, let’s understand the solution: validated assurance.
What is validated assurance — and why does it matter?
Validated assurance is a model that proves security and compliance, instead of just claiming it. It relies on independent verification, standardized frameworks, and centralized quality assurance to deliver consistent, defensible evidence of a vendor’s cybersecurity and privacy posture.
In short, validated assurance means you don’t have to take a vendor’s word for it. Their controls have been tested, verified, and approved against a trusted, recognized standard.
This approach solves a critical problem for both organizations evaluating vendors and vendors being assessed. It replaces unverified, inconsistent evidence with transparent, comparable results that everyone can trust.
How does validated assurance fix the gaps in traditional TPRM?
Traditional third-party risk management relies on subjective, manual, and often redundant processes. It creates friction among risk teams and vendors. Validated assurance replaces this with standardization, evidence, and scalability.
|
Common TPRM Challenge |
How Validated Assurance Solves It |
|
Manual questionnaires and inconsistent evidence |
Standardized, verified assessments provide uniform results. |
|
Self-attested claims and limited validation |
Independent verification confirms the accuracy of control implementation. |
|
Difficult to compare vendor maturity |
Benchmarking and standardized scoring enable objective comparisons. |
|
Point-in-time visibility |
Continuous updates and periodic reviews ensure ongoing risk awareness. |
With validated assurance, organizations move from reactive oversight to proactive confidence, reducing both operational overhead and uncertainty.
How does HITRUST operationalize validated assurance?
HITRUST pioneered validated assurance by building it into every layer of its ecosystem.
- A unified framework
At the foundation is the HITRUST Framework, which harmonizes over 60 global regulations, standards, and best practices into one comprehensive control library. This ensures alignment across multiple requirements.
- Tiered assurance (e1, i1, r2)
Not all vendors require the same level of scrutiny. HITRUST’s tiered assessment model (e1,i1,r2) scales rigor to vendor criticality. This flexibility helps organizations evaluate vendors appropriately without sacrificing consistency.
- Centralized quality assurance
Every validated assessment undergoes a centralized QA review by HITRUST, ensuring each certification meets the same defensibility and quality standards, making the results uniformly reliable.
- Threat-adaptive updates
The HITRUST Framework evolves frequently to keep pace with emerging threats, vulnerabilities, and regulatory changes. This threat-adaptive model ensures that vendor assessments remain aligned with the latest risk environment.
- Automation and interoperability
Through integrations with platforms like ServiceNow via the HITRUST TPRM Services (formerly known as HITRUST Assessment XChange), validated assurance becomes scalable. Organizations can automate evidence reuse, monitor vendor status in real time, and streamline reporting.
- Standardized control set
With standardized controls, HITRUST enables organizations to develop efficiencies as they know exactly which controls were tested.
Who benefits from validated assurance?
Validated assurance is a win-win for both sides of the third-party risk equation.
Assessing organizations:
- Gain verified, comparable assurance across vendors.
- Reduce assessment time and resource strain.
- Build defensible confidence for boards, regulators, and auditors.
Vendors:
- Demonstrate security maturity once and reuse the certification multiple times.
- Reduce audit fatigue from repetitive questionnaires.
- Accelerate sales cycles with trusted, independently verified assurance.
In essence, validated assurance creates a shared ecosystem of trust, where proof replaces promises, and efficiency replaces redundancy.
What’s next?
The transition to validated assurance is more than an operational upgrade. It’s a strategic evolution.
Explore how validated assurance transforms third-party oversight into a measurable, defensible, and scalable model of trust in our new white paper: Redefining Third-Party Risk Management with the HITRUST Validated Assurance.
Validated Assurance: Redefining How Organizations Build Third-Party Trust Validated Assurance: Redefining How Organizations Build Third-Party Trust
Traditional third-party risk management (TPRM) practices may not keep pace as they often rely on manual, self-attested, and inconsistent methods. As vendor ecosystems expand and the frequency and cost of breaches rise, organizations need a new approach — one built on verified, standardized, and defensible assurance like that offered by HITRUST.
What’s driving the third-party risk crisis?
The modern enterprise depends on thousands of third parties for everything from IT infrastructure to cloud services and data processing. According to SecurityScorecard and Cyentia 2024, the average Global 2000 organization now manages over 8,000 vendors providing nearly 18,000 IT products and services, each representing a potential point of risk.
The impact is real.
- 99% of Global 2000 organizations are connected to vendors that have experienced a cyber incident.
- The average third-party breach costs $4.91 million (IBM 2025).
These numbers reveal a growing truth: Cybersecurity risk associated with the supply chain has become material to an enterprise. Even a single weak link can expose the entire ecosystem to breach and disruption.
Why is traditional TPRM challenging?
Legacy TPRM programs were designed for a simpler, slower world. Today, they rely on outdated processes that create friction, delay, and false confidence.
|
Old TPRM Approach |
Modern Reality |
Consequence |
|
Manual questionnaires and spreadsheets |
Thousands of vendors and complex data flows |
Slow, inconsistent reviews |
|
Self-attested vendor responses |
No independent verification |
False sense of security |
|
Disconnected frameworks and formats |
Diverse global standards |
Difficult to compare or trust results |
|
Human-intensive validation |
Limited budgets and staff |
Unsustainable at enterprise scale |
These inefficiencies leave teams overwhelmed and unable to keep pace with expanding vendor ecosystems. Instead of reducing risk, traditional TPRM often becomes an administrative burden that delays procurement and frustrates vendors.
What happens when TPRM becomes a bottleneck?
For most enterprises, the TPRM process has turned into a roadblock. Assessments can take weeks or months, draining staff resources and stalling business. Vendors often repeatedly fill out lengthy questionnaires for every customer, creating frustration on both sides.
The result?
- Procurement delays
- Slower time-to-market for services that depend on vendors
- Inconsistent risk visibility across vendors
- Friction with vendors forced to repeat assessments
In short, traditional TPRM may create more noise than insight, leaving organizations vulnerable to the very risks they’re trying to mitigate.
What’s the better way to manage third-party risk?
Security-mature organizations are shifting from self-attested trust to validated assurance — a model that uses verified, standardized, and quality-controlled assessments to prove that vendor controls are effective.
Validated assurance eliminates redundancy, improves consistency, and provides defensible, audit-ready proof of compliance. Rather than taking vendors at their word, organizations gain confidence from independently verified results.
With validated assurance
- Risk decisions are based on evidence, not assumptions.
- Vendor reviews are faster and reusable.
- Security teams spend less time chasing documentation and more time managing risk.
It’s not just a better way to assess. It’s a smarter way to trust.
How can you learn more?
To understand how validated assurance transforms vendor oversight from a reactive burden into a scalable model of trust, download our latest white paper: Redefining Third-Party Risk Management with the HITRUST Validated Assurance.
Learn how HITRUST empowers organizations to address the challenge of vendor risk management and stay resilient against the growing wave of third-party breaches.